AeroX Diagnostic · €49 instead of €79 · offer ends 15 November

· Olivier Demichel · 5 min read
Updated

Why Aerodynamics is Better for Slower Riders

Contrary to popular belief, aerodynamics is not only for professionals riding at 50 km/h. The slower you ride, the more optimizing your position can transform your final time. Scientific analysis and concrete examples.

Why Aerodynamics is Better for Slower Riders

Introduction

Many cyclists think:

“Aerodynamics is for the pros.”
“Below 40 km/h, it doesn’t make much difference.”

That’s wrong.

The laws of physics are identical for everyone.
And in reality, aerodynamics can represent a much more decisive time-saving lever for amateurs than for professionals.

Let us explain.

At what speed does aerodynamics start to matter in cycling?

Aerodynamic drag becomes the dominant force from just 15 km/h, where it already represents over 50% of total resistance on flat terrain. At 30 km/h, it reaches approximately 80%. Aerodynamics therefore concerns all cyclists, not just those riding above 40 km/h.

Aerodynamic drag (CdA): the resistance force exerted by air on a moving cyclist. It depends on the frontal area (A), the drag coefficient (Cd), and the square of speed. The product CdA (Cd × A) is the key metric: measured in m², it typically ranges from ~0.20 m² (optimized TT position) to ~0.40 m² (upright road position).

In other words: Even at “moderate” speed, air is already your main opponent.


Why do amateurs gain more time than pros by optimizing their aero?

We often hear:

“Pros ride faster, so aerodynamics matters more for them.”

That is partially true… but incomplete.

The reality is that when aerodynamic drag is reduced by 10%, the power saved is also close to 10% as early as 20 km/h. This leads to a speed increase of around 3% at constant power.
This reality is true for everyone.

Concretely, that means going from 40 km/h to 41.2 km/h, and from 20 km/h to 20.6 km/h.

So yes, the faster you ride, the greater the impact aerodynamics has on your speedometer. And gaining a few tenths of km/h may seem negligible at first glance…

And this is where a huge misunderstanding causes amateurs to lose a lot of time on their results…

👉 Let’s talk about time gains

When you ride at 40 km/h, 1 km takes 1 minute 30 seconds. At 41.2 km/h, it takes 1 minute 27 seconds.

When you ride at 20 km/h, 1 km takes 3 minutes. At 20.6 km/h, it takes 2 minutes 55 seconds.

In other words, when a fast cyclist improves aerodynamics by 10%, that’s 3 seconds gained per km. For the amateur riding half as fast, that’s more than 5 seconds gained per km!!!

Amateurs therefore have much more to gain on their overall times by optimizing their aerodynamics.

Time saved per kilometre by speed
051015202030405060Speed in upright position (km/h)Time saved (s/km)
Aero bars (TT, triathlon) Road bike, optimised position

Source: S'entraîner à l'aérodynamisme (O. Demichel, 2026), table 2.3. At the same power as the upright position.

The chart above shows the gains you can target when moving from an upright position to an optimized aerodynamic position on a road bike or on a time trial (or triathlon) bike. And yes, your position can help you gain up to 20 seconds per kilometer when riding at 20 km/h… The effect is amplified over long distances, and on an Ironman (180 km), the impact becomes even more spectacular. When an amateur is aiming to beat cut-off times, position therefore becomes crucial.

How much time can you save over 40 km by optimizing your position?

A 10% improvement in aerodynamics saves approximately 2 minutes 20 seconds over 40 km for a cyclist riding at 32 km/h, compared to only 1 minute 40 seconds for a cyclist at 45 km/h. The slower you ride, the greater the absolute time savings from aerodynamic optimization.

Let’s imagine two cyclists who both improve their aerodynamics by 10%. One initially rides at 45 km/h, the other at 32 km/h.

Estimated gain:

  • At 45 km/h → about 1 minute 40 seconds over 40 km
  • At 32 km/h → about 2 minutes 20 seconds over 40 km

The time gain is therefore always greater for the slower cyclist.

Over an Ironman distance (180 km), a 10% CdA improvement allows an amateur riding at 30 km/h to save more than 10 minutes on the bike leg — without producing a single extra watt.

Aero position vs. power: which is the better investment?

For an amateur:

  • Increasing FTP by 20 watts requires months of training.
  • Reducing CdA by 8 to 12% can be achieved in a few weeks.

And above all:

👉 Position is a free lever.

No need to buy a $10,000 bike.
No need for exotic sensors.

It is about learning to:

  • Optimize your position
  • Hold that position
  • Be powerful in that position

Why do most cyclists neglect aerodynamics?

Most cyclists ignore aerodynamics because it is invisible: unlike power (displayed on the computer) or heart rate (physically felt), aerodynamic drag produces no perceptible signal without dedicated tools. Three main reasons:

  1. Lack of real-time feedback
  2. Difficulty in feeling aerodynamic drag
  3. Excessive focus on power

Power is visible.
Aerodynamics is invisible. But AeroX definitively changes that!

Therefore, it is neglected.


Conclusion

Aerodynamics is not reserved for elites.

It is even more profitable for amateurs.

The real question is not:

“Do I ride fast enough for aerodynamics to matter?”

But rather:

“How many minutes am I willing to leave on the road?”


Frequently Asked Questions

Does aerodynamics matter below 30 km/h?
Yes. From just 15 km/h, air resistance accounts for over 50% of what slows you down on flat terrain. At 25 km/h, it exceeds 70%. Position optimization is relevant for all cyclists, not just fast ones.
How much time can you save on an Ironman with better positioning?
A 10% CdA improvement lets an amateur at 30 km/h save more than 10 minutes over the 180 km bike leg, without pedaling harder. For triathletes targeting cut-off times, this is a game-changer.
What is CdA in cycling?
CdA (Drag Coefficient × Frontal Area) is the number that sums up your air resistance. Measured in m², it ranges from 0.20 m² in an optimized TT position to 0.40 m² sitting upright on a road bike. Reducing CdA by 10% gives about 3% more speed at constant power.
Is it better to train harder or improve your position?
For most amateurs, improving position is faster and more cost-effective. Gaining 20 watts of FTP takes months of structured training. Reducing CdA by 10% can be achieved in a few weeks of position work, and the time savings are often greater.
How can you measure your aerodynamics without a wind tunnel?
Tools like AeroX measure frontal area in real time using a webcam on a smart trainer. Other methods exist (Chung test, on-bike sensors), but only AeroX provides instant feedback during training.

Read more:

Photo of Olivier Demichel
Olivier Demichel

Founder & Engineer

Former CNRS researcher and passionate triathlete, Olivier built AeroX to solve his own aero roadblocks. He now brings scientific rigor and athlete insight to riders — amateur to elite — who want to go faster.

Back to blog

Related Posts

View All Posts »

Bike Fitting: Toward Performance Optimization

Bike fitting still relies heavily on experience and visual observation. But how can we objectively validate the real effectiveness of a position? Toward a new era of aerodynamics-based bike fitting.